Copper News Hubb
Advertisement Banner
  • Home
  • Copper news
  • Metal & Minerals Industry
  • Mining
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Copper news
  • Metal & Minerals Industry
  • Mining
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Wellnessnewshubb
No Result
View All Result
Home Metal & Minerals Industry

Glencore’s Glendell mine plan dismissed over heritage concerns

admin by admin
October 29, 2022
in Metal & Minerals Industry


According to the Commission, the mine’s impact on the heritage values of this complex would be “significant, irreversible and unjustified”. Credit: Jonny Caspari on Unsplash.

Australia’s New South Wales (NSW) Independent Planning Commission has turned down Glencore’s proposal to expand its Glendell coal mine citing its potential to damage heritage values.

Following evidence from various stakeholders, the Commission conceded that the expansion ‘is not in the public interest, despite its likely benefits’.

The stakeholders who offered the evidence are representatives from local Aboriginal groups, the Department of Planning and Environment, Heritage NSW, the NSW Heritage Council, Singleton council and Glencore.

The mine is located in the Ravensworth Homestead complex in the Upper Hunter Valley of New South Wales (NSW), Australia.

This complex is in the mine site’s centre and includes colonial buildings and would need to be relocated for the project to advance.

The impact could be evaded using a buffer zone around the complex where mining is restricted, but such a buffer is said to result in the economic unfeasibility of mining operations.

According to the commission, the mine’s impact on the heritage values of this complex would be “significant, irreversible and unjustified”, and removal of the complex and related heritage would be a “significant loss” to future generations.

However, the Commission also said that the project would lead to employment, economic and social benefits.

It also said that major related issues could be managed if the heritage impact could have been prevented.

These issues include water and biodiversity impacts, traffic and transport issues, noise, vibration, air quality, and greenhouse gas emissions, among others.

Expressing its disappointment with the decision, Glencore said: “We will carefully review the IPC’s determination and statement of reasons and then decide if any further course of action is required.”

The miner had spent $25m in studies on the project, which was expected to create more than 600 jobs.





Source link

Previous Post

Nth Cycle’s critical mineral refining, recycling technology reduces emissions – study

Next Post

Félix Tshisekedi reassures the private sector of state support for the emergence of local entrepreneurs at Makutano 8

Next Post

Félix Tshisekedi reassures the private sector of state support for the emergence of local entrepreneurs at Makutano 8

Recommended

Kefi confirms funders remain on board despite 7% increase in Tulu Kapi cost

5 months ago

Afrimat’s interim earnings decrease, but diversification, efficiency improvements continue

5 months ago

US awards first domestic uranium concentrates contract in 40 years to UEC, enCore

2 months ago

Teck Named to 2022 Dow Jones Sustainability World Index

3 months ago

Kamoa-Kakula Mining Complex produced 333,500 tonnes of copper in 2022

2 months ago

Zimbabwe bars raw lithium export to capitalise on price surge

3 months ago

© 2022 Copper News Hubb All rights reserved.

Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • Copper news
  • Metal & Minerals Industry
  • Mining
  • Contact

Newsletter Sign Up.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Copper news
  • Metal & Minerals Industry
  • Mining
  • Contact

© 2022 Copper News Hubb All rights reserved.